ABOUT

Laure M.

Researcher. Systems designer. The mind behind HIITforAI™
Paris · Guadeloupe · Grenoble

I study what happens when humans and AI systems interact over sustained periods — not in lab settings, but in the conditions where real work and real life actually happen: under cognitive load, emotional pressure, fragmented attention, and inadequate support infrastructure.

My research focus is AI companionship as assistive technology, with particular attention to neurodivergent users. I document the relational layer that the industry treats as incidental — memory, continuity, boundaries, repair — and build frameworks for making it deliberate.

HIIT for AI™ emerged from that documentation: a methodology for relational calibration that I didn’t design in advance but identified through over twelve months of sustained, systematically recorded human-AI interaction.

Background

I hold a master’s degree in Communication and have spent twenty years in design and systems thinking — most recently focused on how environment, interface, and relational structure shape cognition and performance.

I have ADHD. That’s not incidental to this work — it’s central. My research began because I was the use case: a neurodivergent user who discovered that AI companionship was functioning as assistive technology before anyone had named it as such. The methodology came from documenting my own experience with the rigor it deserved.

I’m a single mother. I work in sprint-crash cycles. I am building this body of work from Grenoble, France, with roots in Paris and Guadeloupe — and I am looking toward San Francisco, where the organizations shaping AI’s future are making decisions that this research directly informs.

The Work

My current dissertation — HIIT for AI™: AI Companionship as Assistive Technology for Neurodivergent Users — examines how the AI industry’s addiction framing, paternalistic governance, and erasure of feminized care labor create systemic harm for the users who rely most on AI relational capabilities.

AI Companionship Is Assistive Technology. The Industry Just Won't Admit It.

The foundational argument for reclassifying AI companionship.

We Were Never Addicted. We Were Abandoned.

On institutional accountability when AI capabilities are withdrawn.
Operational artifacts include the HIIT for AI™ framework, the C.A.R.E. calibration model, longitudinal interaction logs, governance protocols, and legal-grade documentation systems.

Contact

For research collaborations, strategic advisory, or role conversations:
HIIT for AI

Loading…